Tuesday, March 27, 2012

“Argue whether the works of Steinbeck are literature?”

If you order your custom term paper from our custom writing service you will receive a perfectly written assignment on “Argue whether the works of Steinbeck are literature?”. What we need from you is to provide us with your detailed paper instructions for our experienced writers to follow all of your specific writing requirements. Specify your order details, state the exact number of pages required and our custom writing professionals will deliver the best quality “Argue whether the works of Steinbeck are literature?” paper right on time.

Out staff of freelance writers includes over 120 experts proficient in “Argue whether the works of Steinbeck are literature?”, therefore you can rest assured that your assignment will be handled by only top rated specialists. Order your “Argue whether the works of Steinbeck are literature?” paper at affordable prices with LivePaperHelp.com!



John Steinbeck was an American novelist and short-story writer of the early


100’s. His works were intriguing and very different for his time, making


room for criticism and ignorance. This essay will provide insights into


whether the works of Steinbeck can be classified as literature, including the


Write my Essay on “Argue whether the works of Steinbeck are literature?” for me

essay writing service



definition of Literature and my opinions and thoughts as a literature reader


and student. It will also look into criticisms, comparisons, feminism and a


bit about the theme and underlying story, written within Steinbecks 1


novel Cannery Row.


The question of ‘what is literature’ is one that will never able to be


responded to with a definite answer. There are still huge steps being taken


and new ones being put into place. The possibilities of literature are


endless, with each new technological find it advances. Thus it is very


difficult to pin down exactly what it is that ensures text fits into the category


of literature. In classifying works by John Steinbeck as literature in this way


I am defining a work of literature as containing a message on the nature of


humanity. Works of literature are works that comment on the human


experience, yet there are other factors that also contribute to the


classification of a text.


Literature may be classified to a variety of systems, including language,


national origin, historical period, genre, and subject matter. Works of


literature also act as cultural resources, speaking of the era and society out


of which they were created.


The worth of a text can be judged by its ability to capture the period of its


creation. A work if literature can also be seen to be one that acts as


symbolic resource. The relationship between it and the reader. Different


readers have different reactions to a text. Thus, different people and


groups of people value different texts for different reasons. One may refute


what might be highly valued by another.


The name is often applied to those imaginative works of poetry and prose


distinguished by the intentions of their authors and the excellence of their


achievement. Sometimes referred to as ‘artistic licence’ by it’s author.


The Concise Oxford Dictionary says it is “ Writings whose value lies in the


beauty of form or emotional effect.” The 1th century critic Walter Pater


referred to “the matter of imaginative or artistic literature” as a “transcript,


not of mere fact in its infinitely varied forms.”


“The art of literature is not reducible to the words on the page, they are


there because of the craft of writing.” As an art, literature is the


organisation of words to give pleasure, through them it elevates and


transforms experiences, through them it functions in society as a continuing


symbolic criticism of values.


Though many would disagree, I do, mostly, classify John Steinbecks work as


literature. Many literary experts either ignore his work or write criticisms


exposing the defects of it.


Even though there were many things that could have been changed,


improved about his work, it was something unformal, more casual than


other stories of around that era. Making his books stand out having a new


age flare, which was obviously not a welcomed accomplishment at that


point in time.


Cannery Row brings together again, in the unchanging world of


literature(art), those qualities of life, rushed by the war, had passed never to


return, and for which Steinbeck is said to have felt a deep sentiment. In


this respect, the novel is firmly in the country life tradition.


The language used in Steinbecks work is simple and maybe his biggest


contribution as a writer, could turn out to be the exploration and


colonisation of the no-mans-land between intellectuals, non-intellectuals,


rational and the subrational. Critics also did not think he deserved the 16


Nobel Laureate in Literature. Which he won for his realistic and imaginative


writings, combining as they do sympathetic humour and keen social


perception.


Some critics even said that his work is only worth reading by


‘un-sophisticated readers’ or for ‘introductory courses in Literature’ to


prepare students to read more complex and mature works. But, how can it


possibly be unworthy of reading when millions read his work every year?


Movies and plays have even been made of his more famous books.


The central theme of most of Steinbeck’s work is the endless struggle of


people who depend for their livelihood upon the soil to sustain themselves.


He saw what others overlooked, dignity in the poor and the oppressed.


Although his characters were often trapped in a naturalistic world of unfair


social and economic forces, they are sympathetic and heroic human beings.


The story is told from an omniscient point of view. Steinbeck has managed


to not only capture one persons thoughts, but many leaving the reader all


knowing about the characters no matter which end of society they are at.


The book that was read by the year eleven English literature class was


Cannery Row, which I personally thought was a bit under our usual


standards, but was a good book for us to realise this and our potential. I felt


Cannery Row offers neither a detailed anatomy of society’s “mangled


craziness” nor a program for changing it. Rather, it brings into being a new


world to replace the one that is in the process of self destruction. I could


even classify it as just the introduction to another story. Something in


which not alot of readers enjoy.


The lingering effect of timelessness, achieved in part by the lack of


movement and the recurrence of specific descriptions and acts is also


something that may irritate some readers.


Steinbeck discovers that what normally might be called “thieves, rascals,


bums” may just as truly be described as “saints, angels, martyrs and holy


men.”(11) As for Doc, the central character, express it, the traits leading


to success in our society are frequently “greed, selfishness, meanness,”


whereas failure may be the result of “kindness, generosity, openness,


honesty, understanding and feeling.” Which in my opinion is very true.


Many readers do not realise messages writers are trying to get across, the


story beneath the story. One with a greater significance and meaning. The


obvious theme in Cannery Row, is one of Mac and the boys and their simple


saintly lives. The underlying theme consists of Doc and his realisation of, in


a way, two ‘sub-worlds’ of Cannery Row and the tide pool.


Steinbeck seems to have represented Doc to make a comparison between


our civilised lives to a miniature universe in the natural world of the pool.


Imitating the life and struggle there. Helping to represent Steinbecks


underlying theme, is a quote from the Bible, “Our Father who art in


Heaven”, only, he has manipulated it to fit in with his story, “Our Father who


art in Nature.”


In Greek plays, there always seems to be a god, who secretly resides among


ordinary mortals. Well, in Cannery Row, this Greek play has some what been


repeated, only a modernised version with the God-like figure being Doc. He


is someone who comes from the upper side of society, un-natural


side-cultured, noble, educated. For this reason the ordinary people seem to


in a way worship him, in return for his helpfulness and kindness. But in


reality, Doc is in search of truths, of his own God if you like?


In terms of feminism, Cannery Row is a typical male written novel. Not once


in the story does Steinbeck portray women and men as equals. Although,


this was very typical of novels based around this era. Women do not play a


significant part in Cannery Row, they are more like shadows or playing


supporting roles rather than actual characters. The images of women in this


novel also are few and far apart. Dora Flood, the Bear Flag Restaurant owner


is portrayed as the wise old woman. Someone who is like the Row’s social


glue. No-one really likes her but because of the contributions she makes to


society, she seems to be respected. Also Dora’s profession is undermining


to women, making out that exploiting women is a good thing would be


unheard of now-a-days.


In comparison to Shakespear, Steinbeck was not as advanced and


knowledgable towards the actual events that were taking place around him,


who people really were. He only gave the idealistic view to his readers.


Unlike Shakespear who was able to not only give the point of view from a


male perspective but compose women not only as an object but as their


own person, with their own feelings, thoughts and emotions, which amounts


to the complex creature that is woman.


In conclusion, this essay has discussed a few different aspects of the novel


Cannery Row and John Steinbeck as a writer. Exploring the definition of


Literature and my opinions and thoughts as a literature reader and student.


It also mentioned criticisms towards Steinbeck, comparisons, and


underlying theme of Cannery Row.


By Elise Wilson


Please note that this sample paper on “Argue whether the works of Steinbeck are literature?” is for your review only. In order to eliminate any of the plagiarism issues, it is highly recommended that you do not use it for you own writing purposes. In case you experience difficulties with writing a well structured and accurately composed paper on “Argue whether the works of Steinbeck are literature?”, we are here to assist you. Your cheap custom college paper on “Argue whether the works of Steinbeck are literature?” will be written from scratch, so you do not have to worry about its originality.

Order your authentic assignment from LivePaperHelp.com and you will be amazed at how easy it is to complete a quality custom paper within the shortest time possible!



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.